Alice and Bob go Shopping

Alice is a beautician by trade, and Bob is a general labourer.

Alice’s skills are quite in demand; let’s say she can earn £16 an hour (take-home, after taxes). She is self-employed, and there are some times when the business is quiet. Bob’s paid work usually earns him £8 an hour (take home), when he can find any work, but quite often he can’t.

Let us suppose that each has both a normal bank card and a DWP time-bank card. The DWP time-bank, with which both Bob and Alice are currently in credit, is a large but fairly simple database, recording the amount of time each participant has spent working unpaid at some qualifying activity. I will explain this in more detail later.
Alice and Bob go into a supermarket. They see that, alongside the money-price displayed next to each item, some of the items (those currently classified as necessities) also show a time-cost.

The money-price of each good is determined by the usual market forces; the  time-cost is an estimate of the amount of working-time it takes to produce that good, from raw materials to supermarket checkout.

Let’s say that one particular item has a market price of £4, and a time-cost of 20 minutes. (These are not meant to be realistic figures; they are picked as simple numbers, to explore the principle.)

Alice elects to buy this item with her Visa debit card. Bob pays with his time-card. The DWP pays £4 to the supermarket for Bob’s item, and deducts 20 minutes from his time-account..

(The DWP is in no way involved in Alice’s transaction.)

Both Alice and Bob have acted in accordance with their perceived best interests. It takes Alice 15 minutes to earn £4, so she reckons the money- price is a better deal for her than the 20 minutes time-cost. Bob has bought the same item with 20 minutes from his time-account, which is a gain for him, since it would take him half an hour to earn £4 at his paid work.

For Bob’s purchase the DWP has paid the market price (£4) directly to the supermarket, which means the tax-payer has effectively paid Bob £4 for 20 minutes of work.

But how is Bob able to find the sort of work that puts credit into his time-bank, if he cannot find similar work at £8 an hour? And how does Alice, who runs a pretty efficient business of her own, come to have credit in a DWP time-bank?

Look around. There is plenty of work that needs doing, but no-one is able (or willing) to pay for it. Local government operations regularly have need of temporary workers, in all sorts of work areas. Non-profit organisations, suitably vetted, also might be entitled to advertise for unpaid workers, and to credit the time worked to the participant’s DWP account. A dedicated web-site could advertise all qualifying jobs in any given locality.

Also, if, on his morning walk, Bob notices a massive growth of Japanese knotweed, or a broken bit of fencing somewhere, why should he not be able to phone the local council, and offer to sort the problem, for some negotiated amount of time-credit?

If Alice wants to supplement her business income during the quiet weeks, and at the same time do something for her community, she might spend a few hours helping social services; maybe visiting old ladies, doing their hair and nails, drinking tea and chatting. That time could, if she wanted, be credited to her time-account. And why not?

THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF WORK TO BE DONE.

A system like this, implemented nationwide, could mean the end of ‘unemployment’ as a category.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s